4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
10
4
3
5
1
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
6.0
12.0
3.3
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
104
111
40
63
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação