4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
16
13
18
3
2
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
6.2
6.1
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
530
47
34
23

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação