4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
3
18
6
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
3.3
6.1
4.7
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
40
47
146
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação