4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Número de testes
16
18
3
13
24
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#4
#1
Average position
5.5
6.1
3.3
6.3
2.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
47
40
111
151

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Eficiência de combustível
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
60%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação