4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
18
5
6
3
1
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
Posição média
5.5
6.1
2.2
4.7
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
47
63
146
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação