4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
21
14
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
11.9
5.6
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
164
47
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
53%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação