4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
21
3
5
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
11.9
3.3
2.2
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
164
40
63
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação