4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
6
3
18
3
1
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
4.7
3.3
6.1
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
146
40
47
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação