4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
16
6
3
18
1
5
Melhor posição
#3
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
4.7
3.7
6.1
1.0
2.2
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
146
34
47
64
63

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação