4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
3
6
3
5
1
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
3.7
4.7
3.3
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
34
146
40
63
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação