4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
3
26
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
3.7
2.2
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
34
66
40
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação