4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Número de testes
16
14
3
3
3
Best position
#3
#8
#2
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
13.4
3.3
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
153
40
34
60

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação