4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Nokian WetProof

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Nokian
WetProof
Número de testes
16
8
4
21
13
14
Best position
#3
#8
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
26.4
12.0
11.9
6.2
5.6
Teste mais recente
2023
2023
2025
2024
2026
2023
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
161
111
164
530
47

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Nokian WetProof
53%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Nokian WetProof
46%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação