4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
18
13
3
1
6
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#3
#2
Average position
6.1
4.3
3.3
1.0
4.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
123
40
64
146
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação