4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
18
13
6
1
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
4.3
4.7
1.0
3.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
123
146
64
40
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação