4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
18
4
2
1
3
24
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
12.0
2.0
1.0
3.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
48
64
34
302

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação