4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
18
4
2
3
1
24
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
6.1
12.0
2.0
3.7
1.0
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
48
34
64
302

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação