4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
18
4
1
2
3
24
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
12.0
1.0
2.0
3.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
64
48
34
302

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação