4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Número de testes
18
4
1
3
3
14
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
12.0
1.0
3.3
3.7
5.5
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
64
40
34
706

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação