4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Número de testes
18
4
3
14
3
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.3
5.5
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
40
706
34
60

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação