4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
18
4
3
6
1
5
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
2.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
40
146
64
63

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação