4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
18
4
3
2
1
24
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
6.1
12.0
3.7
2.0
1.0
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
34
48
64
302

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação