4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
18
4
3
1
3
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
34
64
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação