4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
18
10
4
3
3
3
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
104
111
40
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação