4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
18
3
4
5
1
3
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
3.3
12.0
2.2
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
63
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação