4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
3
4
6
5
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
12.0
4.7
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
146
63
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação