4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
3
4
6
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
146
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação