4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
3
4
3
2
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
34
48
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação