4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
18
3
4
17
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
12.0
1.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
80

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação