4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
18
16
6
1
3
5
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
5.5
4.7
1.0
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
153
146
64
34
63

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação