4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
18
16
3
3
1
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
5.5
3.7
3.3
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
153
34
40
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação