4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
21
4
3
6
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.1
11.9
12.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
164
111
40
146
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação