4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
18
21
3
1
3
3
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
6.1
11.9
3.3
1.0
3.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
164
40
64
34
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação