4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
18
21
3
1
26
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
6.1
11.9
3.3
1.0
2.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
164
40
64
66

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação