4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
3
13
3
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
3.7
4.3
3.3
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
34
123
40
40
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação