4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
18
14
1
3
3
5
Melhor posição
#1
#9
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
19.7
1.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
145
64
40
34
63

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação