4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodride
Solmax 1
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
1
13
3
5
2
3
1
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
4.3
3.7
2.2
1.0
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
46
123
34
63
23
40
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Custos

Custos
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Conforto
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Seco

Seco
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação