Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Número de testes

1

5

6

3

15

Best position

#8

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

8.0

1.0

2.2

4.7

3.7

1.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

46

64

63

146

34

122

Molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Frenagem úmida

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Custos

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Seco

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Travagem a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Ruído exterior

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Seco

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação