Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 7

Número de testes

1

5

6

33

26

Best position

#8

#1

#3

#1

Average position

8.0

1.0

2.2

4.7

4.1

2.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

46

64

63

146

658

66

Molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Frenagem úmida

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Custos

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Quilometragem

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Preço/valor

Goodride Solmax 1

96%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Ruído exterior

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Seco

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Travagem a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação