Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

UltraContact NXT

Número de testes

1

5

3

23

2

Best position

#8

#1

#2

#1

Average position

8.0

1.0

2.2

3.7

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

46

64

63

34

188

23

Molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Frenagem úmida

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Custos

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Ruído exterior

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Seco

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Travagem a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Solmax 1

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação