Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Solmax 1

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Número de testes

1

3

1

3

2

Best position

#8

#1

#2

#7

#2

#1

Average position

8.0

1.0

3.7

7.0

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

46

64

34

—

40

23

Molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Frenagem úmida

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Custos

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Quilometragem

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Seco

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Travagem a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Conforto

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Ruído exterior

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Solmax 1

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Seco

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação