4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Budget
GoodrideGoodride

Solmax 1

3.9
R17 – R22
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Médio-alto
YokohamaYokohama

BluEarth-XT

5.5
R13 – R
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPrémio
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Goodride
Solmax 1
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
1
1
3
1
5
6
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#7
#1
#3
Average position
8.0
1.0
3.7
7.0
2.2
4.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
46
64
34
—
63
146

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Frenagem úmida
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
100%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
96%
Desempenho em piso seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Travagem a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
67%
Conforto e ruído
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Ruído externo
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Economia
Hankook ION Evo
76%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone Roadhawk 2
49%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Quilometragem
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2025215/55 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação