4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget
GoodrideGoodride

Solmax 1

3.9
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Prémio
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Goodride
Solmax 1
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
1
26
13
6
1
3
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
2.2
4.3
4.7
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
46
66
123
146
64
34

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
60%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Frenagem úmida
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
46%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
96%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Travagem a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Conforto e ruído
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Ruído externo
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Economia
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone Roadhawk 2
49%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook ION Evo
76%
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Quilometragem
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2025215/55 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação