4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget
GoodrideGoodride

Solmax 1

3.9
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Médio-alto
YokohamaYokohama

BluEarth-XT

5.5
R13 – R
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPrémio
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Goodride
Solmax 1
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
1
26
6
1
3
5
Best position
#8
#1
#3
#7
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
2.2
4.7
7.0
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
46
66
146
—
34
63

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Frenagem úmida
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
83%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Falken e.Ziex
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
75%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
69%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken e.Ziex
70%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Travagem a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
67%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
75%
Conforto e ruído
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Ruído externo
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
57%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Falken e.Ziex
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Economia
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone Roadhawk 2
49%
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
60%
Quilometragem
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2025215/55 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação