Comparação: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP2

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza T005

Test profile

EcoControl HP2

WetProof

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Número de testes

8

14

10

18

11

Best position

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.8

5.6

6.0

6.1

11.6

Teste mais recente

2024

2023

2026

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

30

47

104

47

121

Molhado

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Frenagem úmida

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Curva em círculo molhado

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Guia lateral húmida

Fulda EcoControl HP2

79%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Seco

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Travagem a seco

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Manuseamento a seco

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Conforto

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Ruído exterior

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Conforto

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Ruído interior

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Custos

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Quilometragem

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Resistência ao rolamento

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Preço/valor

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

Nokian WetProof

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
ADAC	Verão	2023	205/55 R16	Ver

Comparação: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

EcoControl HP2

WetProof

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Testes mútuos

Contribuir para a comparação