4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Número de testes
19
29
3
2
Best position
#5
#1
#4
#1
Average position
10.7
3.7
4.3
2.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
101
178
97
48

Molhado

Molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 4
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Winterhawk 4
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 4
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%

Neve

Neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%
Encanto da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
66%

Seco

Seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Winterhawk 4
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Mudança de faixa seca
Firestone Winterhawk 4
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Winterhawk 4
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 4
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Ruído interior
Firestone Winterhawk 4
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Custos

Custos
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 4
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 4
39%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Preço/valor
Firestone Winterhawk 4
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação