4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
19
23
17
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.7
6.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
101
107
80

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 3 testes

Desempenho em molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 4
78%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 4
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 4
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 4
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 4
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Firestone Winterhawk 4
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
58%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 4
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
77%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 4
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Desempenho no gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 4
82%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Frenagem no gelo com ABS
Firestone Winterhawk 4
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Conforto e ruído
Firestone Winterhawk 4
69%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Ruído externo
Firestone Winterhawk 4
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Conforto ao rodar
Firestone Winterhawk 4
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71%
Economia
Firestone Winterhawk 4
71%
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 4
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 4
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Inverno
2024205/55 R16Ver
ADACADAC
Inverno
2022185/65 R15Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação