4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Nokian
WR D4
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
14
26
23
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
16.0
6.0
6.7
Teste mais recente
2020
2019
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
82
107

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Nokian WR D4
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Nokian WR D4
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Nokian WR D4
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Nokian WR D4
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Nokian WR D4
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Nokian WR D4
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Desempenho em molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Nokian WR D4
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Nokian WR D4
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Nokian WR D4
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Nokian WR D4
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Encanto da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Nokian WR D4
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Nokian WR D4
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Nokian WR D4
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Nokian WR D4
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Nokian WR D4
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Nokian WR D4
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Nokian WR D4
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Preço/valor
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Nokian WR D4
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Nokian WR D4
99%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Nokian WR D4
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Nokian WR D4
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ruído interior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Nokian WR D4
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Nokian WR D4
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Gelo

Gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Nokian WR D4
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Nokian WR D4
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Nokian WR D4
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2017225/50 R17Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2017225/50 R17Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação