4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin
Alpin 5
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
14
17
19
17
Best position
#3
#2
#3
#1
Average position
16.0
5.9
11.2
1.7
Teste mais recente
2020
2018
2021
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
91
76
80

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Michelin Alpin 5
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Desempenho em molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
59%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Encanto da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Michelin Alpin 5
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Michelin Alpin 5
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Michelin Alpin 5
96%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Michelin Alpin 5
75%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Preço/valor
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Michelin Alpin 5
97%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
66%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Michelin Alpin 5
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Gelo

Gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Michelin Alpin 5
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação