4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Barum Polaris 3

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
Barum
Polaris 3
Número de testes
14
17
23
19
8
10
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#3
#12
#3
Average position
16.0
5.9
2.3
11.2
22.3
10.6
Teste mais recente
2020
2018
2021
2021
2021
2018
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
91
76
76
43
67

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Michelin Alpin 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Desempenho em molhado
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%

Neve

Neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Tracção na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Manipulação da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Desempenho na neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
Travagem de neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Encanto da neve
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
Barum Polaris 3
87%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Michelin Alpin 5
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
67%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Michelin Alpin 5
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
Barum Polaris 3
87%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Quilometragem
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Michelin Alpin 5
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Michelin Alpin 5
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
83%
Preço/valor
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Michelin Alpin 5
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Barum Polaris 3
84%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Ruído interior
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Michelin Alpin 5
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
60%
Conforto
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
Barum Polaris 3
71%

Gelo

Gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Michelin Alpin 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
Travagem brusca
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Michelin Alpin 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
89%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2018195/65 R15Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2018195/65 R15Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2017225/50 R17Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2016205/55 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação